Looking for help with an assignment? Connect with an assignment Expert Now!

Please use the DPP School Level Review Checklist to ensure mentees have met the requirements within each section of the DPP form. This checklist is a guide to help the mentor and the mentee.

Please use the DPP School Level Review Checklist to ensure mentees have met the requirements within each section of the DPP form. This checklist is a guide to help the mentor and the mentee.. Instructions

Please use the DPP School Level Review Checklist to ensure mentees have met the requirements within each section of the DPP form. This checklist is a guide to help the mentor and the mentee.

  1. It is an expectation that the mentee will review the checklist and initial all items completed prior to sending to mentor, found at: https://campus.capella.edu/web/doctoral-programs/professional//capstone or

https://campus.capella.edu/web/school-of-nursing-and-health-sciences/doctoral-capstone  

 

  1. Mentor review of the DPP checklist:

 

  1. The mentor will review each section of the DPP checklist confirming the outlined requirements have been met.
  2. If met, the mentor will place their initials in the met box for that section.
  3. If not met, the mentor will place their initials in the not met box and provide feedback under “Reviewer’s Comments” in the sections not met.

 

  1. Committee review of the DPP checklist:
    1. Once the mentor has approved the DPP form and completed a review of the checklist, the mentor will send the initialed DPP checklist and the DPP form to the mentee’s committee for review.

Each committee member will

  1. If met, place their initials in the met box for that section.
  2. If not met, place their initials in the not met box and provide feedback under “Reviewer’s Comments” in the sections not met.
  3. The committee member will send the checklist back to the mentor to provide to the mentee.

 

  1. School level review- Once ready for school level review, the mentor will:

 

  1. Remove all comments on the DPP checklist that have been corrected
  2. Leave the reviewer’s initials approving the DPP form as met.
  3. Send the DPP checklist with the approved DPP form to school level review.

 

  1. School level review will use the DPP checklist to confirm that each section has been met. If not approved the reviewers will provide feedback on how to meet the requirements on the DPP checklist under “Reviewer comments” within each section.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Learner__________________________________           Mentor ___________________________________________

Committee Members _______________________________________________________________________________

Section Requirements : DPP Part 1 Met Not Met / Comments
PICOT Question ·         Appropriate PICOT question that meets all components to include population, intervention, comparison (If applicable), outcome, and time.

 

Reviewer’s comments to learner:

1.

Demining a Need and Gap in Practice

 

 

·         Explains the background and significance of the proposed practice problem with the organization.

·         Provides internal data to support that this problem is a priority through a needs assessment within the practicum site.

·         Discusses the current practice for the practice problem, such as the current the policy/procedure or what is currently done.

·         Include description of conversations with leadership and/or key decision makers, as well as stakeholders who will be impacted by the project.

·         Provide 2-4 studies or EBP guidelines that support this needed change

 

Reviewer’s comments to learner:

·

Population/Problem ·         Describes the population and problem in terms of role, age range, diagnosis, procedure, etc.

 

Reviewer’s comments to learner:

1.

Intervention ·         List 2-3 potential interventions that can be applied in this practice change?

·         Practice recommendations are identified and consistent with the synthesis of the literature.

·         There is logical progression from the synthesis of the literature to the practice recommendation to the proposed intervention of the project.

·         Defines the intervention very specifically and operationally so that anyone replicating this project could apply the same intervention.

 

·         Describes the  learner role in the practice change

·         Appropriate appendices are included

 

Reviewer’s comments to  learner:

1.

Comparison ·         Discusses the comparison for the intervention which is likely the standard treatment or usual care.

·         If there is no comparison, the learner has discussed the current state versus the desired state of care.

·         Discusses the potential impact of the practice change to which that the learner will be comparing.

 

Reviewer’s comments to  learner:

1.

Outcomes ·         Discusses the desirable outcome(s).

·         The outcomes are measurable. Describes how the outcome(s) will be measured.

·         Describes the validity and reliability of any existing tool that they will use.

·         Describes at what point(s) in time the data will be collected and how it will be analyzed.

·         Measures compliance by discussing what evaluation criteria will use to ensure the planned change occurred as planned.

·         Discusses the type of data produced by the evaluation tools (e.g., nominal, ordinal or interval). Discusses what statistical tests will be used to determine if the selected intervention produced the outcome desired.

 

Reviewer’s comments to  learner:

1.

Timeframe ·         Provides a detailed and feasible work plan and timeline for completing the capstone. The timeframe is broken down by milestones within each quarter.

 

Reviewer’s comments to  learner:

1.

 

 

School level review performed by and date:

Version 1 __________________________________________________________

Version 2 __________________________________________________________

Version 3 __________________________________________________________

Version 3 co-reviewer ________________________________________________

Version 4 __________________________________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

Learner__________________________________           Mentor ___________________________________________

Committee Members _______________________________________________________________________________

 

Section Requirements:  DPP Part 2

 

Met Not Met/ Comments

 

Introduction ·         Identify the focus of the project and the significance (includes at least 1-2 background studies).

·         Provides the project goals and the relationship to the PICOT question.

 

Reviewer’s comments to  learner:

1.

Review of Literature

 

·         Articles reviewed with a minimum of 20 required, all published within the last five years, unless a seminal article.

·         Describes extensive review of the literature (including keywords, search phrases, databases used, number of articles found, inclusion/exclusion criteria, number of articles retained and why).

·         Provides information on the significance of the problem, such as the following: incidence and/or prevalence, national data and quality/regulatory expectations, impact on patient, family, and healthcare system, financial implications, cultural, healthcare policy, quality, safety, legal, ethical implications if pertinent.

·         Thorough review and critical analysis of literature.

·         Synthesis of evidence supporting the question and project. This is not an annotated bibliography.

·         Provides completed evidence table.

 

Reviewer’s comments to  learner:

1.

Framework

 

 

·         Describes theoretical framework or conceptual model.

·         Connects study goals and PICOT to framework or model.

·         Defines study variables.

·         Describes any study assumptions.

 

Reviewer’s comments to  learner:

1.

Method ·         Describes project design, setting, population and sampling.

·         Describes human subject’s protection methods (as applicable).

·         Identifies outcome measures.

·         Describes implementation plans including thorough description of implementation process; psychometric properties (reliability and validity) of any instruments used; status of permission to use instruments; procedures for data collection.

·         If the instrument is not public, permission to use the instrument is attached as an appendix.

·         Describes project evaluation including type of data analysis.

·         Discusses the anticipated findings.

·         Discusses the study limitations:

·         Factors that might limit internal validity.

·         What efforts will be taken to minimize and or adjust for the limitations?

 

Reviewer’s comments to  learner:

1.

Sampling ·         Discusses the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

 

Reviewer’s comments to  learner:

1.

Meet program-specific requirements for proposal/research plan approval. ·         Completes evidence table, includes all references in DPP.

·         Complete reference list for DPP.

 

Reviewer’s comments to  learner:

1.

Write with logic, flow, etc.
Write with proper grammar, usage, APA etc.
Date of  learner revision(s)

 

 

Date of preceptor revision(s) request/approval

 

 

Date of committee revision(s) request/approval

 

 

 

School level review performed by and date:

Version 1 __________________________________________________________

Version 2 __________________________________________________________

Version 3 __________________________________________________________

Version 3 co-reviewer ________________________________________________

Version 4 __________________________________________________________

Please use the DPP School Level Review Checklist to ensure mentees have met the requirements within each section of the DPP form. This checklist is a guide to help the mentor and the mentee.

Get a Quick Quote

Approximately 250 words
Total price (USD) $: 10.99

Pressed for time on your upcoming paper? We can help!

Bored with homework

Reviews from Clients who Ordered from Our Website

Why Us?

Quality

We use grammar & plagiarism softwares and a Quality Assurance Editing Team to ensure you get a ready to submit paper

Fast

We understand how tight deadlines can get and are always eager to work and beat tight deadlines

Revision

To deliver the best results we offer endless revisions to ensure you get just what they asked for

Personalised

You get to chat and interact with the writer to ensure the paper meets all standard requirements

How it Works

Place an Order

Provide your contact information, select an order type, and describe your requirements. This isn’t going to take long!

Image showing step 1 of making an order
Image showing how to make payment for your order

Select an Appropriate Writer

We’ll match your specifications with our available authors after we have all of the relevant information concerning your order.

Image showing how to download your completed results

Enjoy the End Product

One of our specialists will fulfill your purchase according to your specifications so that you are happy with the end result.